The first image, 55mm, was the one closest in the view finder to my natural vision with both eyes open. In fact if I could have zoomed in a fraction more it would have been perfect. When it was printed on to A4 paper I couldn't physically stretch my arms far enough to make the printed image appear the same size as what I could see, so the best viewing position for this image would have been if I could have pinned it to a wall and taken a step backward.
The second image, 23mm, was most like what I could see when I could hold the print right out at arms length. A little further would have actually been better.
The third image, 18mm, was best when held at exactly arms length.
What I have noticed is that the longer the focal length used, the further away the image must be for it to appear a 'normal' size. Smaller focal lengths produce images that have to be viewed close up to see all of the detail. What surprises me is how much the angle of view changes from what I perceive as normal and the standard focal length, an awful lot is lost. I will have to take this into account when I consider what shots I'm taking and where the final prints might be published. This will also help me to decide on print sizes for future assignments based on how I want to portray an image.
No comments:
Post a Comment